Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Reprod Update ; 4(5): 570-83, 1998.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10027611

RESUMO

Antiprogestins can modulate oestrogenic effects in various oestrogen-dependent tissues, dependent on species, tissue, dose and duration of treatment. Enhanced oestrogenic responses to mifepristone and onapristone occur in vitro and in vivo. However, the antiprogestins mifepristone, onapristone, and ZK 137 316 can block the ability of oestradiol to increase endometrial growth in non-human primates. Our purposes were firstly, to decide whether mifepristone and onapristone had direct oestrogenic activity in vitro and in the uterus of spayed and immature rats, and secondly, to discover whether antiprogestins exhibit inhibitory effects on oestrogen action in the uterus in spayed, oestrogen-substituted rats. In transactivation assays, mifepristone induced oestrogenic response, whereas onapristone had only marginal effects on reporter gene transcription. In immature rats, onapristone and mifepristone markedly increased uterine weights, and onapristone, but not mifepristone significantly enhanced endometrial luminal epithelial height, a sensitive oestrogen parameter. Conversely, in spayed and adrenalectomized rats, neither onapristone nor mifepristone changed uterine weights or endometrial morphology, indicating that their effects in immature rats were indirect. In spayed, oestrogen-substituted rats, antiprogestins did not block oestradiol-stimulated endometrial growth and luminal and glandular epithelium were stimulated more after antiprogestin plus oestrogen, than after oestradiol alone. All compounds induced compaction of the uterine stroma. In spayed rats, onapristone and some other 13alpha-configured (type 1) antagonists (ZK 135 569, ZK 131 535) reduced oestradiol-stimulated myometrial proliferation and induced an overall uterine weight reduction in animals treated with oestrogen and antiprogestins, in comparison with oestradiol-treated controls. 13beta- configured (type II) antagonists, including mifepristone, lilopristone and ZK 112 993, were not effective. In the uteri of spayed rats, onapristone was also found to enhance the oestradiol-stimulatory effect on expression of the oestrogen-dependent proto-oncogene, c-fos. In conclusion, antiprogestins do not inhibit, but rather enhance, oestrogen-induced uterine glandular and luminal epithelium in spayed rats, contrary to their effects in primates. The rat model is unsuitable to study endometrial antiproliferative effects of antiprogestins in primate uteri.


Assuntos
Estrogênios/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Hormônios/farmacologia , Progesterona/antagonistas & inibidores , Útero/fisiologia , Animais , Neoplasias da Mama , Estrogênios/fisiologia , Feminino , Gonanos/farmacologia , Humanos , Mifepristona/farmacologia , Tamanho do Órgão/efeitos dos fármacos , Proto-Oncogene Mas , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Receptores de Estrogênio/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores de Estrogênio/fisiologia , Células Tumorais Cultivadas , Útero/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 82(8): 2596-600, 1997 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9253340

RESUMO

To shed light on the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyomas, transcript levels of the immediate early genes c-fos, c-myc, and c-jun and of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were determined in tissue samples of human myometrium and leiomyoma. The messenger RNA (mRNA) content was analyzed by RT-PCR. mRNAs for c-fos, c-myc, c-jun, ER, and PR were detected in all 18 samples of leiomyoma and corresponding myometrial tissue collected in this study. Interestingly, in contrast to healthy tissues, we found a distinct and significant reduction of c-fos mRNA in the tumor. These data were substantiated by the finding of lowered c-Fos protein levels in leiomyomas tissues. Moreover, transcripts of c-jun and c-myc were less abundant in most of the leiomyomas than in the myometrium. This different expression of the protooncogenes in leiomyomas and myometrium was independent of the phase of the menstrual cycle in which samples were collected. In contrast to the reduced transcript levels observed for the immediate early genes, the ER and PR mRNA contents of the leiomyomas and myometrium did not differ. These results were confirmed by immunohistochemical studies for ER and PR protein. In conclusion, our data show that the deregulated expression of protooncogenes, especially of c-fos, is linked to the pathogenesis of leiomyomas. Confirmation of a potential role of downregulated c-fos levels for the benign character of these tumors requires further investigation. Additionally, the findings suggest that sex steroids do not influence the different expression patterns of c-fos, c-myc, and c-jun in leiomyomas, as compared with myometrium.


Assuntos
Genes Precoces , Leiomioma/genética , Miométrio/química , RNA Mensageiro/análise , Receptores de Esteroides/genética , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Feminino , Genes fos , Genes jun , Genes myc , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Ciclo Menstrual , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula em Proliferação/análise , DNA Polimerase Dirigida por RNA , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/genética , Receptores de Esteroides/análise
3.
Anim Reprod Sci ; 46(1-2): 55-67, 1997 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9231247

RESUMO

The effects of a progesterone antagonist (onapristone) on heat synchronization, luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, ovulation, oocyte maturation and fertilization of superovulated ewes were studied. Its effects on in vitro bovine oocyte maturation and fertilization were also studied. Estrus synchronization and superovulation treatments were applied to 39 adult ewes using an intravaginal sponge with fluorgestone acetate for 9 days with injections of prostaglandin F2 alpha and pregnant mare's serum gonadotrophin given 24 h before sponge withdrawal. The animals were randomly assigned to four different groups; T1 receiving only the synchrony treatment (n = 11); T2 ewes received two injections of onapristone (1 mg kg-1, i.v.) 12 h apart from 3 h after sponge withdrawal (n = 10); T3 ewes received two injections of progesterone 12 h apart from sponge withdrawal (n = 10); and, T4 ewes received both onapristone and progesterone as described (n = 8). Ewes were mated by a fertile male during estrus. Progesterone and LH were measured during the superovulation period in plasma samples taken every 4 h. Uterine flushings for ova recovery were performed at 5 days (n = 25), 48 h (n = 5) and 24 h (n = 5). Non-fertilized oocytes collected at 24 and 48 h were checked for meiosis resumption. The effects of two doses of onapristone (D1 and D2) on in vitro bovine oocyte maturation (control = 100, D1 = 100 and D2 = 100) and fertilization (control = 107, D1 = 40 and D2 = 75) were also studied. The percentage of animals showing heat signs was significantly lower in group T3 (50% vs. 100%). The onset of oestrus (27.6, 24.8, 68.8 and 25.5 h, respectively for T1, T2, T3 and T4) and an LH surge (32.3, 28.8, 76.5 and 30.5 h, respectively for T1, T2, T3 and T4) after sponge withdrawal were significantly delayed in group T3. There were no significant differences in the intervals between estrus and LH surge among groups (4.61 +/- 0.75 h). The response and ovulation rates until 40 h after sponge withdrawal (group T3 excluded) were similar among groups, but the fertilization rates were significantly lower in groups T2 and T4 when compared with T1 (2% and 3% vs. 41%, respectively; P < 0.001) due to sperm arrest in the cervix. Ova recovery rate decreased significantly from 24-48 h to 5 days and was not affected by treatments (76.9% vs. 37.1% respectively). Onapristone did not affect the resumption of meiosis. Fertilization of bovine oocytes in vitro decreased significantly only in group D2 when compared to control (48% vs. 62.6%, respectively). In conclusion, onapristone treatment during the preovulatory period did not interfere with normal synchronization of estrus, ovulation and oocyte maturation but severely compromised fertilization by arresting spermatozoa in the cervix.


Assuntos
Sincronização do Estro/efeitos dos fármacos , Fertilização In Vitro , Fertilização/efeitos dos fármacos , Gonanos/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Hormônios/farmacologia , Ovinos/fisiologia , Superovulação/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Sincronização do Estro/sangue , Sincronização do Estro/fisiologia , Feminino , Fertilização/fisiologia , Gonanos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Injeções Intramusculares , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Hormônio Luteinizante/efeitos dos fármacos , Hormônio Luteinizante/metabolismo , Masculino , Oócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Oócitos/fisiologia , Gravidez , Progesterona/administração & dosagem , Progesterona/sangue , Progesterona/metabolismo , Distribuição Aleatória , Ovinos/sangue , Ovinos/metabolismo , Superovulação/sangue , Superovulação/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Steroids ; 59(3): 176-80, 1994 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8048148

RESUMO

An efficient approach to 17-chloro-16(17) unsaturated D-homo antiprogestins is described. The key steps of the synthesis are a ring-expansion via dichlorocarbene addition to a 17-silyl enol ether and a palladium catalyzed coupling of an 11 beta-(4-aryltriflate) with tributyl(1-ethoxyethenyl)stannane or diethyl(3-pyridinyl)-borane. The new progesterone antagonists were tested for their biological activities and compared to those of known antiprogestins.


Assuntos
Progestinas/antagonistas & inibidores , Esteroides Clorados/síntese química , Esteroides Clorados/farmacologia , Aborto Induzido/métodos , Animais , Feminino , Estrutura Molecular , Gravidez , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...